A learner is like a mediator. For learning to take place both within the learner and in his surrounding, the learner needs to get a perspective of both sides he is mediating -- himself and everyone else. It is the mediator's responsibility to take a situation and bring both parties to a resolution, without picking sides. If we view learners likewise, as a mediator, he/she needs to look at both sides of the story (information in this case) and analyze these. The mediator brings information from one party to the other (him/herself to the community and vice versa) and lets them ponder what has just been exposed. The mediator's job is to bring some kind of compromise -- new views, ideas, etc. In his article "Connectivism: Rethinking learning in a digital age" Siemens states the role of the learner's knowledge as "a network, which feeds into organizations and institutions, which in turn feed back into the network, and then continue to provide learning to individual." The learner himself is that network that negotiates new ideas and loose thoughts, analyzes these and comes up with a "new" set of knowledge for the whole. In the digital age, this role is crucial but it must not just occur with one learner, it must continue to occur with all of the participants of a community. If not, learning is stagnant and the entire learning process is limited for all. The effectiveness of the whole community will never reach its prime and may in fact fail. As learners, we must continue this process in our lives and within the network, it must be a never-ending cylcle. "Information flow within an organization is an important element in organizational effectiveness." (Siemens)